$mathematica student$

#Mathematica student software#
#Mathematica student license#

I used to use Wolfram-Alpha and wasn't familiar with Mathematica, however, I got a copy of it in 2016 and started practising with linear algebra, complex analysis, number theory, several variable polynomials and general calculus.

#Mathematica student license#

I am a mathematics graduate and I have used Maple and Matlab as the university offered the license for both.

#Mathematica student software#

(ii) an alternative solution was considered and Mathematica preferred for specific reasons ('it was the only software we could afford or that was available to tackle the job', is not a valid reason to qualify the application as real-world, according to this definition) a commercial product was sold, or consulting fee earned) and By 'real-world' I mean specifically applications in which:

In any event I am looking for counter-examples of real-world applications to refute my hypothesis about Mathematica. In these areas, it seems to me, Mathematica is like a Swiss Army Knife: sure you can use it to dabble in almost anything but I have screwdrivers, knives and corkscrews that do a better job for their specific purpose. In both these cases, however, there is no standard, specialized alternative offering in the field of risk management, as there are, for example, in engineering, CAD, app design, or music. Likewise, I am somewhat familiar with Phil Zecker's work at EQA Partners, where he produced an outstanding risk management solution using Mathematica. In my own work, I have used Mathematica to price complex derivatives products, a field in which it excels. I am aware of applications where the use of Mathematica is fully justified. To take one such customer story from the field of 3D CAD, I don't understand why anyone would prefer to use Mathematica for such a task, rather than a specialist product like Solidworks. But why would you, when there are much better alternatives available?'. And, in general, when I look at the examples cited by Wolfram in its 'customer stories', my reaction to many of them is: 'Sure, you can use Mathematica to do that. In my own work in finance, for instance, it has generally proved much less useful than other products such as Matlab. But I have noticed that, in practice, Mathematica somehow fails to live up to its apparently unlimited potential for encapsulating creative thought-product across an almost unlimited span of human intellectual endeavor. I don't want this conjecture to be true: I'm as much a buyer of the hype around Mathematica as the next man.

the speculative endeavors of a fertile, creative intellect might readily be mistaken for actual (scientific) achievement by less agile minds.) (Of course, one man's dilettantism is another man's New Kind of Science: i.e. I have a theory, which I am in the process of writing about in a blog post, that other than in applications in mathematics (symbolic logic), Mathematica's primary usefulness is in encouraging a kind of intellectual dilettantism. In any event, I am interested in hearing about other real-life applications. The only 'real-world' application that meets the specified criteria offered so far (twice) has been Wolfram Alpha (I am not entirely sure that it meets the second criterion - would you choose to develop WA in WL, if you didn't have a bunch of WL experts and a WL development platform at your disposal?). I originally posted this on Stack Exchange, where it was suggested it would more appropriately be posted here. Finance, Statistics & Business Analysis.Wolfram Knowledgebase Curated computable knowledge powering Wolfram|Alpha. Wolfram Universal Deployment System Instant deployment across cloud, desktop, mobile, and more. Wolfram Data Framework Semantic framework for real-world data.